I Tried Playing a Murder Mystery Game Completely Alone. Here's My Honest Review
Share
I'll be honest about how this started.
It was a Saturday night. I had no plans. My friends were all busy with various life things. And I found myself sitting on my couch at 7 PM with the familiar feeling of "I should do something" but absolutely no motivation to figure out what.
The obvious move was TV. Pick a show, zone out, let the evening pass. That's what I usually do.
But I was tired of that. Tired of passively consuming. Tired of looking up from my phone at 10 PM realizing I barely remembered what I'd just watched.
I wanted to do something active. Something that would actually engage my brain.
That's when I remembered reading about case file-style mystery games—the kind designed for solo play. You receive a murder case file with evidence, suspects, forensic reports. Your job is to analyze everything and figure out whodunit.
I'd been curious for a while. And apparently tonight was the night.
Finding a Game
Here's what I learned quickly: there's a LOT out there.
Search "detective case files games" and you'll find everything from mobile apps to elaborate boxed games to downloadable files. The quality varies wildly. Some are clearly designed for casual players who want a light puzzle. Others are aimed at serious mystery fans who want genuine investigative depth.
I ended up choosing one called "Journey Without End" set in Paris—a tour guide found dead in her locked hotel room, four suspects from her tour group, and a stack of evidence for me to analyze. It was available as an instant digital download (no waiting for shipping), had strong reviews, and the Case File Edition was specifically designed for solo detective work.
$19.90. Bought. Downloaded. Let's go.
Setting Up (The Ritual of It All)
I printed everything. Yes, I know I could have just looked at it on my laptop, but something about spreading physical documents across my dining table felt right. Like I was actually setting up an investigation.
What I got:
- Professional case file with police documentation
- Suspect profiles and background checks for all four suspects
- Witness statement transcripts
- 15 pieces of evidence with forensic analysis
- Autopsy and medical examiner reports
- A detective's worksheet for taking notes
I poured a glass of wine. Put on some atmospheric instrumental music (Spotify has "dark academia" playlists that are weirdly perfect for this). Spread everything across the table.
And suddenly I wasn't just "doing something"—I was preparing to solve a murder.
The ritual matters more than I expected. The physical setup. The ambiance. Treating it as an event rather than just an activity. It transformed my headspace entirely.
The Case
Here's the setup:
Margaret Chen, a tour guide, is found dead in her Paris hotel room. The doors were locked from the inside. The hotel phones went down overnight—some kind of technical failure—so no one could call for help. By the time she's discovered, she's been dead for hours.
Four people from her tour group become suspects:
David Chen (45) — The ex-husband. They divorced years ago. He admits he went to her room that night, but claims she was "already dying" when he arrived.
Ethan Parker (22) — A medical student whose father is currently in a coma. He says Margaret was somehow responsible and admits he came on this trip specifically to confront her.
Sophia Lin (21) — A pianist who discovered the body at 5 AM. She knows this makes her look guilty but insists Margaret was already dead when she found her.
Rachel Martinez (30) — A professor who admits she and Margaret fought that night. Margaret apparently attacked her. But she swears Margaret was alive when she left.
Four motives. Four alibis. Four stories that almost make sense—but don't quite hold up under scrutiny.
The Experience of Playing
The first phase was just... absorbing information. Reading through witness statements. Getting a sense of each character. Understanding the basic facts of the case.
I wasn't really analyzing yet. I was just letting the information sink in.
The second phase was when it got interesting. I started creating a timeline. Who was where at what time? When did everyone claim to go to bed? When did they claim to wake up? Who saw whom, and when?
This is when contradictions started appearing.
Someone's statement didn't match the timeline. A detail in the forensic report raised questions about someone's alibi. A relationship I'd assumed was straightforward turned out to be more complicated.
I started taking notes furiously. "Why was [redacted] in the hallway at 3 AM when they claimed to be asleep?" "The [redacted] doesn't match what the autopsy says about time of death." "What's the real history between [redacted] and Margaret?"
By the third phase, I had a theory. I was pretty confident about who did it. I could see the motive, the opportunity, the method.
But there were still pieces that didn't fit. Details in the evidence I couldn't explain. A few contradictions in my theory that nagged at me.
I went back through everything. Reread witness statements with fresh eyes. Cross-referenced the forensic evidence against my timeline.
And that's when I saw it.
The thing I'd missed. The detail that changed everything.
My original theory was wrong. The actual solution was more elegant, more surprising, and, in retrospect, completely supported by evidence I'd had from the beginning but hadn't properly connected.
The Verdict (No Spoilers)
I'm not going to tell you who did it or how. That would defeat the point.
But I will say: the solution was fair. Everything I needed to solve it was in the evidence. No trick endings, no information pulled out of nowhere at the last second. Just careful analysis leading to a logical conclusion.
And the satisfaction of getting it right (on my second theory, after my first one fell apart) was real. Not manufactured. Not given to me. Earned.
What I Didn't Expect
It wasn't lonely.
This was my biggest concern going in. "Solo murder mystery" sounds almost sad. Party for one. Sitting alone in your apartment trying to solve a fake crime.
But I was so absorbed in the puzzle that I genuinely didn't notice I was alone. My brain was too engaged—building theories, testing hypotheses, hunting for contradictions—to register loneliness.
It was like reading a really good book, except instead of passively receiving a story, I was actively constructing it.
It scratched a specific itch.
I listen to a lot of true crime content. Podcasts. Documentaries. Those deep-dive YouTube videos about unsolved cases.
But consuming true crime is passive. Someone else does the investigation. Someone else builds the timeline. You just absorb their conclusions.
This was different. I was the one analyzing the evidence. I was building the case. I had to earn the solution.
For true crime fans, that's a completely different (and arguably more satisfying) experience.
The difficulty level was right.
I was worried it would be either too easy (solve it in 20 minutes, feel unsatisfied) or too hard (never figure it out, feel frustrated).
It was neither. The solution required genuine thought but was absolutely achievable. The game respects your intelligence without trying to stump you unfairly.
Time flew.
I started at around 7:30 PM. When I looked at the clock after solving it, it was nearly 10.
Two and a half hours. Gone. And it felt like maybe 45 minutes.
When's the last time you did something where time disappeared like that?
Who Should Try This
Based on my experience, I'd recommend solo case file mystery games for:
True crime fans who want to participate, not just consume. If you love the investigative process—building timelines, analyzing evidence, forming theories—this is for you.
Puzzle lovers who've burned through other options. Escape room apps. Logic puzzles. Crosswords. If you've done them all and want something different, this hits different.
People who want a solo activity that isn't passive. Something that engages your brain. Something you actively do rather than consume.
Introverts who want a meaningful way to spend an evening alone. This beats scrolling. It beats half-watching something while on your phone. It's genuine engagement.
Anyone trying to build a "detective brain." The skills transfer. Close reading. Pattern recognition. Timeline construction. Healthy skepticism of stated alibis. These are muscles you can develop, and mystery games are good training.
What I'd Do Differently
Honestly? Not much. The experience was better than I expected.
If anything, I'd:
- Take even more detailed notes from the start
- Build my timeline on a physical piece of paper rather than trying to hold it in my head
- Resist the urge to lock into a theory too early
That last one is key. I was so sure I knew who did it halfway through that I started ignoring evidence that pointed elsewhere. Classic confirmation bias. The solution only clicked when I forced myself to question my assumptions.
Good life lesson, honestly.
Would I Do It Again?
Absolutely. In fact, I'm already looking at what to play next.
The same company makes an RPG version of this mystery where four players become the suspects themselves. I'm assembling a group for that. Different experience entirely, but same rich story.
And there's a whole world of case file-style games out there I haven't explored yet. Different settings. Different difficulty levels. Some with true crime storylines based on historical cases. Some with puzzle elements beyond pure deduction.
For anyone who's ever wondered whether solving a murder mystery alone on a Saturday night is a reasonable way to spend an evening:
Yes. Yes it is.
Way more reasonable than whatever you were planning to do instead.
